A Letter to the Editor

The following is a Letter to the Editor I submitted in response to an article featured on the Inforum website. I do realize that this isn’t funny, but it is important. Please read the original, my response, and tell me your opinion. As a manager in the service/retail industry, most of my employees earn wages that afford little luxury, often falling short of making ends meet. I believe that the act of spreading information and increasing awareness of this issue is the only way to bring about change, thereby increasing their job satisfaction and overall quality of life. Please share this, especially if you live in the FM area, if you think people deserve good wages for good work.

 

In Paul Campbell’s opinion column from April 21, he takes aim at the increase in minimum wage for Minnesota and the debate on it nationally. Unfortunately, Mr. Campbell’s arguments miss the mark, and instead, repeat tired political party lines.

First off, Mr. Campbell cannot even take credit for this affront to the world of print media, as it suspiciously parallels a much better article by James Sherk featured on The Heritage Foundation’s website. Mr. Campbell does at least make it his own by providing his hackneyed opinion throughout the piece. Since it was featured, read, shared, and likely discussed in my community, I will refute it all the same.

Mr. Campbell begins laying out his arguments with a misunderstanding of the meaning of words, claiming, “In order to redistribute wealth, you must first take from someone who has it, and use force if necessary.” Increasing wages is, by definition, not wealth redistribution. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, it is “The social mechanism, such as a change in tax laws, monetary policies, or tort law, that engenders the redistribution of goods among these subjects.” Increasing the minimum wage does not take money from businesses, but requires them to pay fair wages for fair work. His reference to using force is deplorable, and an unacceptable attempt to scare readers away from the opposing view.

From here, Mr. Campbell takes another misstep by stating, “The minimum wage comes down to simple economics. When you raise the price of something, the demand for it goes down. Therefore, when you raise the price of labor by raising the minimum wage, the demand for labor goes down.” While this is true in terms of goods and services, it’s more complicated when you’re looking at labor.

A business’ labor needs are dictated by demand for the product or service offered and the business’ other options to manufacture a product or provide a service. An increase in the cost of labor at a factory, for example, could result in an increase in automation, assuming that automation became more cost effective than employee cost at that point.

However, this doesn’t provide reasoning for Mr. Campbell’s claim, “That means a restaurant owner who employs 10 people and worriedly stares at a slim profit margin as it is would have to pass those costs on to his or her employees or customers, or sometimes both. That means letting employees go or raising prices.” The example Mr. Campbell gives is that of a restaurant, not a factory where work can be automated or outsourced. He is, of course, forced to give this example since factories are largely unionized, and outsourced work deserves its own conversation, entirely.

In the scenario given, the restaurant owner’s decision to have 10 people employed is not a function of cost, but in order to effectively staff the restaurant. Eliminating employees due to cost in this scenario would mean that the owner either: 1) Was over-staffed, a poor business decision in its own right, or 2) The business will no longer be able to provide the same level of service it had before, and will lose sales.

The other option in this scenario is that the owner would raise prices. This is a potential option for the business owner, but Mr. Campbell gives no information about the increase. This is because, to maintain the same profit margin pre-wage increase, the new cost for the customer would be pennies on the dollar. Let’s do some math:

Assume the owner is paying his employees $7.25 (which is probably too high, since they’re tip earning) and increases everyone’s wage to $10.10 (again, likely not the case). That is a difference of $2.85, per employee, per hour. In this scenario, we’re not given any specifics of this restaurant, so I’ll use average numbers from the café I manage, which has close to the same number of staff.

In a typical business day, my café will require around 25 payroll hours. Payroll hours are the sum total of hours each employee works. The increase in payroll cost per average day then is $181.25 to $252.50, an increase of $71.25 a day.

On average, I sell about 90 things (coffee, pastries, sandwiches, etc.) an hour. Let’s put the average cost at $2.00. That means, on average, $180 of revenue comes into my café per hour, resulting in revenue of around $2,160 a day.

Daily revenue of $2,160 and daily payroll cost of $181.25 means that each hour an employee works needs to generate $11.92. What would the daily revenue need to be to maintain that number? $2,341.25, resulting in an average cost of about $2.17 per item sold.

Mr. Campbell really must have the poor in mind when he worries about such miniscule price differences. Of course, this is only considering the margins a small business faces. Large businesses operating at greater scale would see even less significant price differences. I wish I could say that this were the end of the problems in the arguments presented to us, but far from it.

Mr. Campbell goes on to cite the Congressional Budget Office’s claim that the wage increase would result in the loss of 500,000 jobs, a startling statistic if we ignore the fallacies within it.

First, job loss does not necessarily mean an increase of unemployment. Since we are talking about low earning jobs, it’s no secret that many of these people work more than one. In fact, in 2010 the U.S. census found that 7.6 million Americans work more than one job. A wage increase for low-wage earners would mean that people wouldn’t need to work more than one job. Conversely, it makes sense for a business to employ one full-time employee instead of multiple part-time employees due to insurance, training, and other costs that come along with maintaining a larger staff.

Second, this is the worst-case scenario presented by the CBO. To see the far more likely scenarios, read the letter over 600 economists have signed at the Economic Policy Institute. It discusses how an increase in wages results in more money flowing into the economy, less dependence on government programs, better outlooks for families and children, and other aspects of the American Dream.

At this point, Mr. Campbell provides another shockingly meaningless statistic. He tells us that only 2.8% of the population makes the minimum wage. This seems to say that people are, in reality, much better off than Obama would have us believe. Again, his argument makes no sense when you actually look at it.

First, employees receive raises. If an employee makes $7.30 instead of $7.25, they are no longer earning a minimum wage and aren’t included in this statistic. Are they earning a living wage? The point of raising the minimum wage isn’t to help only those earning the minimum, but all people that make up the working-poor class.

Second, he presumes that, since around 50% of that 2.8% (which we already know to be irrelevant) are between 16-24, and 64% work part-time, that they must be students working summer jobs. Perhaps Mr. Campbell should turn off his Leave it to Beaver episodes and take a look at the real world.

Sure, some of that number does represent high-school kids, earning a little money as purely disposable income. This isn’t a bad thing by the way, it gets recycled back into local economies. More to the point, I employ several people in that age-range that are not in school, don’t live with their parents, and are supporting themselves. Please, keep your Mitt Romney, “borrow money from Mom or Dad,” comments to yourself, because that obviously isn’t the answer here. These are working young people that depend on their paychecks just as much as anyone else does.

Once Mr. Campbell has finished “analyzing” the part of the statistic he wants to look at, he then fails to make the next logical step that 50% of these people are then NOT students, working part-time jobs. No, these are people working, trying to provide any income that they can for themselves and their families. Remember the earlier statistic about 7.6 million people working more than one job?

Now, Mr. Campbell takes a strange turn, saying, “Eventually, employees refuse to work for such little pay, and employers are forced to increase it. That’s the way it should be. The market essentially eliminates the minimum wage and sets one based on supply, demand and the cost of living.”

He seems to be talking about a labor force striking or taking other collective action to demand a pay increase. What, exactly, does Mr. Campbell think is happening in America? Are we to believe that a member of the media was unaware of the Occupy Movement, the fast-food workers striking in New York and dozens of other cities, and countless citizen outcries for this? I also find it hard to believe that someone who believes that minimum wage jobs are, “where they learn the practicalities of work and value of earning a dollar,” would support such efforts.

He then claims that the free-market eliminates the need for a minimum wage, which is so far from the truth, I had to make sure I hadn’t misread it. If the free-market ensured fair wages, there wouldn’t have been a Labor Movement, we wouldn’t have Unions, and we never would have had a minimum wage in the first place. Why does Mr. Campbell think these things exist? Also, if the minimum wage had kept up with the cost of living (inflation), the minimum wage would already be $10.86, according to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics Consumer Price Index. So why does he claim these things?

We’re nearing the end, and Mr. Campbell rolls out the party talking points, arguing that reducing government regulation will magically result in higher wages. If you believe this, please re-read my previous paragraph because my fingers are getting too tired to reiterate it.

Finally, we reach the thrux of the piece. Mr. Campbell asks, “So what’s the point of raising the minimum wage?” He asserts that this is all political posturing, simply trying to win votes. I assert that this is our workforce, regardless of age or station in life, getting fair treatment. I believe that some people genuinely do have the interest of the common good in mind. I do agree with one thing though, Mr. Campbell, let’s think bigger.

Advertisements

You Need These?

My professional life reached a new low recently. As you may know from some of my earlier posts, I work in a bookstore. For some reason, bookstores attract the…what’s the opposite of the “cream” in cream of the crop? Well, what ever that is, it’s walking among the rest of the perfectly normal book-lovers.

This particular notch in my Olympian punishment belt was earned on the most recent Sanctimonious Saturday, the Saturday between Good Friday and Easter Sunday. It’s named this thanks to the following conversation.

“Are you open on Easter?”

“Yeah, regular store hours.”

“Oh my. Well, I won’t be shopping here anymore.”

Now read that, like, a dozen more times.

My day already had an odd vibe, I had helped a woman with translucent pajama pants and flowery thong before 10am, and I was curious to see what the rest of the day would bring. Luckily, around noon, a very unique person returned to my store.

He had been in the previous evening, and asked for an ambulance to be called because he suspected that he was having a heart-attack. As he and a manager waited for an ambulance to arrive, he explained that this heart attack was probably caused by his earlier use of meth, cocaine, ecstasy, anti-depressants, and a few other medications. The ambulance eventually arrived, and he was carted off.

Now he was back, less than 24 hours later, and looking to make amends.

“Thanks for calling the ambulance, I feel much better today,” He told the cashier, who happened to be the same cashier from the previous night.

“Oh!” She said, surprised by the unusual resurrection before her. “I’m glad.”

The man then proceeded to take a seat in the cafe of the store, and begin reading some magazines. After some time had passed, I was grabbing some dirty dishes at the table next to the man. There were some unused napkins at the table, and as I was clearing them, he reached for them as well.

“Oh, did you need these?” I asked.

His outreached hand then began moving strangely, like he was trying to work out a cramp in every muscle in his hands and arm, and he made a peculiar face. A face that my wife, when I recreated for her later, described as, “very upsetting.”

It was at this time I noticed the large amount of opened pornography underneath his table and put the pieces together. Needless to say, this made me more than a little angry at the man. Realizing that my current emotional state would not lead to a good resolution in this matter, I called for a fellow manager to assist.

“Hey, our friend from yesterday just had an…episode.” The words oozed out of my mouth like sick, thick blood.

The other manager arrived quickly, we began questioning the man about his intentions with our store. At this point, a woman from a nearby table revealed that she was a nurse at a local homeless shelter and believed that she may have helped the man in the past. I, seeing that the situation was under control, went outside and said every swear word I know in alphabetical order.

Oh, I forgot to mention one thing: he had a bunch of nail polish jars on the table. They didn’t come into play, but I just thought it was weird.

The f-ing End

 

 

On my ill-ness

My nose runs and my throat tickles,

My brain swims and my eye trickles.

 

I don’t feel well and I don’t think good.

I want to write a post, but don’t think I could.

 

I started a story, then had to quit,

my knees shaking as I try not to –

 

Flit to another idea.

 

I need to sleep, I need some Zzz’s.

I submit this poem, now if you please…

 

– Forgive the slant rhyme,

Poor meter,

Bad structure –

 

Turn of the light as you leave.

Booze Your Own Adventure: Chapter 3

You turn to your friends, “What should I do?” With the wisdom of cheap alcohol flowing through their veins, a resounding cry for a confrontation rises up. You keep a cooler head, though.

“We had fun together, I just want to say hi.”

You get up and walk over to your ex’s table, feeling a little nervous. How would your attempt at fence mending be taken? Is it even worth the effort?

“Hey.”

“Oh, hi.”

“I, uhh… just wanted to say that, I know things were bad at the end, but I guess I just wanted you to know that I hope we can… bury the hatchet or something.

Your ex is visibly stunned, likely expecting a major confrontation or emotional plea.

“Yeah, yeah that’d be cool.”

“Great, well, see ya around.”

You walk back to your table and your friends all lean in, demanding to know what happened. You tell the story and their faces are overcome with a mixture of the disappointment of witnessing a disaster avoided and acknowledgement of the higher road.

“Alright, well that’s something to celebrate,” your friend enthusiastically says, “Shots!”

You feel good about your fence mending, and don’t want to end the party just yet. At the same time, you’ve had a couple of drinks already and don’t want to get carried away.

 

Babies on a Plane

I took my young daughter on a plane recently, and I was surprised by a few things. The first was the airline’s treatment of my child. When getting my ticket, I had to list her as an, “Infant in Arms,” which makes me think of a baby military.  This process included writing her name, and birth date, and NOTHING ELSE! I didn’t need to provide a birth certificate, any sort of hospital records, nothing. Nothing at all. I could have brought, literally (and I mean literally) any baby on that plane. I’m trying to figure out if there is a way to make money from this, but so far all my ideas involve me being a truly terrible person.

The next thing is that when we left the hospital with our little bundle, we were required to have a car seat. They wouldn’t let us leave with the baby (in a car) without one.  Planes, on the other hand, you can (again, literally) hold the baby in your arms. Car going 65mph 2 feet off the ground? That baby is gonna need a special, rear-facing seat with a five-point harness, only to be used in the back seat of the car. Plane going 500mph at 30,000 feet? NBD, you can just hold it, or something. Heck, even your drink has a special spot on the tray so it doesn’t slide around.

One thing you cannot hold during landing or take-off, on the other hand, is a laptop. In fact, your laptop needs to be stowed, in a bag, either under your seat or in the overhead bin.

“Uh, excuse me sir?”

“Yes?”

“I’m afraid you’ll need to stow your laptop before take-off”

“Oh, this isn’t a 5lb laptop, it’s my 25lb child.”

“I’m so sorry to bother you, I thought you were holding something important, like a computer.”

I was also surprised that people didn’t hiss and boo as I walked through the airplane. I was fully expecting that, at some point during the flight, for someone to turn around and say something awful to my child and I like,

“Stupid baby, why does your stupid baby make so much stupid noise?! I’m trying to watch 13 Going on 30 on my iPhone for the millionth time and your stupid baby is really taking me out of the movie!”

Or

“Your damn diaper baby keeps crying! Why is your diaper baby so damn annoying. I didn’t bring any headphones on this plane because I want to annoy the person next to me with bland conversation and I can’t do that with your friggin’ diaper baby crying!”

I even spent time coming up with responses. All of them level headed, and on-point.

“FYOU, YOU STUPID JERK!”

And

“OH YEAH?! Spits on face.”

Luckily, I didn’t need to bust out any of these. To the contrary, a few people on flights helped entertain my baby by waving, clapping, and making funny faces. These people helped remind me that, in the mountain of shit that is modern air-travel, a few people are not garbage. Thank you, fellow humans. Thank you.

Internet Museum

In 8th grade typing class, where I learned nothing (srsly, I type like I have ninja turtle hands) we had a favorite way to pester the teacher. A new website had just come to our attention and we loved bringing it up on our computers. The only real deterrent the teacher had was telling us that she could watch what we were doing on our computers from hers. That only made things worse.

This was the website.

This was one of the first internet memes, and has a somewhat interesting story. Read about it here.

This brought me to an interesting thought: why isn’t there an internet museum? Well, a .43 second Google search revealed over 1,200,000 results, with one being good. It’s here.

The online internet museum is great. Just like a real museum, you learn enough to go, “huh, I didn’t know that,” but don’t really leave any smarter. It did make me wonder about something else, though.

Eventually, human consciousness will be overtaken by artificial intelligence. This isn’t science-fiction; acting unit Keanu Reeves is already capable of displaying over 4 human-like emotions. When this happens, I like to think that robo-anthropologists (robothropologists?) will explore the early internet the way we explore early civilizations. What will they think? What will they find?

Surely, some websites will no longer be accessible, leaving holes in the available knowledge. We encounter the same problem, though. When this happens, we hypothesize in order to see a complete culture. Our future robot-overlords may need to do the same thing with images like this. What will they process when they find this image everywhere, but seemingly no b0eginning? Will they make the same error we do and assume that it must be some sort of meaningful icon, and not just internet-fap-assery? Maybe, they won’t have the need to fill in these knowledge gaps, and just understand that it was, and then wasn’t.

I wonder about what our internet culture will make us look like. Don’t worry, this isn’t a, “back in my day, we…” rant. No, I greatly enjoy our democratized humor, where cat photos and funny grammar reign supreme. I mean genuinely, what are the important internet artifacts? What would you hope that Skynet finds as it combs through the digital wasteland of a post-human earth?

 

Booze Your Own Adventure: Chapter 2

Last week’s choices were to meet up with your friends, or stay in and work. Like the Choose Your Own Adventure series, once choice can lead you down a very different path than the other. This week, I’ll give both options (because I wrote them, and liked them both) but here on out, I’ll only post the chapter that wins.

You Chose: Stay in and work on your presentation

“Sorry, I have a really big presentation tomorrow. Gotta pass tonight. Next time?” As you hit Send on your phone, you feel your heart drop a little.

Many years later, while reading the holo-news in your driverless car, you come across a startling story about your former friend. “… was hit by an automated garbage truck while leaving Zorbaks Liquor. Authorities have ruled out foul-play, but say alcohol was involved.”

You haven’t seen your friend in years, but you had heard rumors from mutual acquaintances of an alcohol problem. Your friend always did love a party, but near the end of your friendship seemed to no longer care about finding pretenses to drink and instead drank for the sake of drinking.

As you wonder if it would seem odd for you to attend the funeral, or if there would even be one, you think back to the last words you said to this person. “Next time?” rings in your ears the way only the silence between a question and an answer that will never come can.

After achieving massive success with your company and eventually going on to run the entire organization, you had always looked back at that day as a turning point. Before, it was the day you became someone in your field, the day you finally came into your own professionally. Now, you look at it as the day you turned your back on a friend truly in need.

THE END

You Chose: Meet Your Friends for a Drink

“Alright just one” you send back to your friend. “I’ve got everything I need ready. Why not have a little fun?” you think to yourself.

You change out of the sweatpants and t-shirt you had been wearing, shower, and put on your favorite shirt. As you check yourself in the mirror, you stop and say, “Remember, you have a big day tomorrow. Be good!” Your friend has a way of convincing you to have more fun than a person typically should in a single sitting, but you’ve got a good feeling, and commit yourself to having a fun evening.

Traffic was light as you head downtown and you make good time. After finding a nearby parking spot, you head inside your favorite bar.

“Over here!” Your friend is turned around and waving to you enthusiastically from a table. Several of your other friends are there and you sit down at one of the last remaining spots.

“What did I miss?” You ask.

“A couple of cheap-ass shots.”

“Is it still going on?”

“Nah, it was just for an hour.”

You turn around to order a drink with the server and notice, in a booth across the bar, your ex. You two had been together for three years, and in one horrible month, it all fell apart. You were left with an apartment you couldn’t afford, a cat you didn’t want, and a broken heart.

Five tough weeks later and you’re finally feeling comfortable in your single life. That is, until chance encounter has it all slamming back again. The fights, the differences, all the anger. But good stuff too. You two were really happy together. Most of the time, anyway.

You want to talk to this person, to say all that was left unsaid.

 

 

Sword in a Knife Fight

I don’t get how double edged sword means something good and bad. The phrase implies that you’ll cut your opponent with one edge and cut yourself with the other, but I don’t think that’s how swords work. Granted, I’ve never used a sword, let alone, compared the qualities of single v. double edged ones, but I have seen a lot of movies.

I have a scar on the pointer finger of my left hand that I got from mismanaging a banana situation. I had two bananas hanging from a banana hook and I wanted to eat one, but somehow let the last one remain on the hanger. Now, if I simply pulled the bananas apart, neither one would have enough stem to hang on a hook. I decided that I would cut the stem off of one, that way there would be a little stem-hook so the other one could hang.

For some moronic reason, I did this with the bananas still on the hanger. My knife sliced through the stem and right into my finger. Side note: the saying, you never cut yourself with a sharp knife, is more about being responsible with your equipment, and properly maintaining it, than the actual ability of a knife to cut a human. This was a very sharp knife.

I have something good and something bad. Good things: one banana to eat, and one banana that can hang. Bad things: a deeply cut finger, and two bloody bananas. It would seem then, that my single blade knife has become a double edged sword. I consider this an upgrade.  Now, I think I’ll go slay some dragon fruit.

 

Do I Still Pay Full Price, Then?

My first job was cooking at Perkins. It was pretty terrible. I was 16 and worked way longer and later than the law allowed. I worked with people who frequently did drugs…at work. But there was one thing we always did: prepare the food.

“No crap, Einstein. That’s sort of implied with your title, cook, huh?”

We’ll there’s where you’re wrong. I recently had a run-in with some food that required an additional step before eating. The Wife, Baby, and I were at Bubba Gump Shrimp (yeah, we fancy) and I ordered… the shrimp plate? … something like that. Anyway, I like shrimp, but don’t eat it much.

Our food arrives, and I begin eating. If you’re a frequent eater of sea-bugs, you probably can see where this is going. After a few minutes, the Wife mentions the basket in the center of the table for shells.

“What shells?” I reply.

“The shrimp. They have shells on them. You’re supposed to take the shells off first.”

silence

“Have you been eating the shells?”

“Yeah.”

“Didn’t you think that was weird?”

“I thought they were crunchy.”

“They have feet on them.”

“Yeah, so do cows and chickens. I eat a lot of things with feet. Pig’s feet are delicacies in a lot of places.”

And this brings me to my complaint; why was I supposed to take part in the preparation of my food? Correct me if I’m wrong, but I pay the cook to make the meal. If I order a cheeseburger, and I’m brought an un-cut bun, a cooked patty, and a plate of toppings, my response would be, “What in the f- is this?” However, everyone turns and drools when a plate of fajitas sizzles its was across a Mexican restaurant. Why can I, in the same restaurant, order a salad as a meal or get the salad bar and do all the f-ing work myself?

I like cooking. The Wife and I are pretty good at it, too. That doesn’t mean that we go to Fridays thinking, “We’re gonna show these little s-o-b’s how to make some wanton tacos, damnit!” No, I want the cook to cook, and I want my only obligation to be opening my mouth, jamming it with fried f-ing cheese, and getting the squirts 20 minutes after I get home.